That Nobel Peace Prize: Bashes Bush, Handcuffs Obama - MidEastTruth.com
 
MidEastTruth Forum Index
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MidEastTruth Forum Index
MidEastTruth Forum Index MidEastTruth Forum Index  

Daniel Pipes is director of the Middle East Forum and Taube/Diller distinguished visiting fellow at the Hoover Institution of Stanford University. His bi-weekly column appears regularly in newspapers around the globe.
His website, DanielPipes.org, is one of the most accessed internet sources of specialized information on the Middle East and Islam.

MidEastTruth Forum Index
MidEastTruth Forum Index

FAQFAQ SearchSearch Homepage MemberlistMemberlist UsergroupsUsergroups RegisterRegister   Help us stay online!
ProfileProfile Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages Log inLog in


donate
Jump to:  

Post new topic   Reply to topic    MidEastTruth Forum Index -> Daniel Pipes
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
editor
Editor
Editor


Joined: 24 Feb 2003
Posts: 3412

PostPosted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:21 am    Post subject: That Nobel Peace Prize: Bashes Bush, Handcuffs Obama     Bookmark and Share
Reply with quote

That Nobel Peace Prize: Bashes Bush, Handcuffs Obama

By Daniel Pipes
October, 9, 2009

"He won what?" is the universal first reaction.

And second, at least on the Right: "Why did they do that?"

Even the Nobel committee's citation does not pretend Barack Obama has actually achieved anything. Rather, it was given to him "for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples." That's efforts, not achievements.

Reading carefully through the entire citation suggests that Obama is being celebrated for two reasons. Its chatter about "a new climate," the United Nations, a "vision of a world free from nuclear arms," and "great climatic challenges" points to his being the anti-George W. Bush.

Second, the prize committee hopes to constrain Obama's hands vis--vis Iran. It lauds him for not using force: "Dialogue and negotiations are preferred as instruments for resolving even the most difficult international conflicts." This is obviously gibberish: whereas Bush did not use force against North Korea, Obama does not rely on dialogue in Afghanistan. But the statement does pressure Obama not to use force in the theater that counts the most, namely the Iranian nuclear build-up.

So, from the Leftist Norwegian point of view, it's a twofer bash Bush and handcuff Obama.

My prediction: The absurdity of the prize decision will harm Obama politically in the United States, contrasting his role as international celebrity with his record devoid of accomplishments. Michael Steele, chairman of the Republican National Committee, notes that Obama "won't be receiving any awards from Americans for job creation, fiscal responsibility, or backing up rhetoric with concrete action." Expect to hear much more along those lines.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    MidEastTruth Forum Index -> Daniel Pipes All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 








Powered by phpBB(c) 2001, 2005 phpBB Group.